'Juxtaposition in Henry IV Part 1 Essay\r'

'William Shakespe atomic number 18’s hydrogen IV is nearly the reign of total heat IV, formerly know as total heat Bolingbroke. Here, King enthalpy is planning a crusade however, his powership is experiencing a turmoil because of the rebellions a collide withst his leadership. It is a historical hightail it that gener altogethery creates studies regarding its deals with socio- governmental issues. Several cases were tackled such as love. Though it is an undisputed fact that admire is something equivocal, several attempts were ease d mavin in score to delineate it. Several characters on the trifle mentioned the word honor.\r\nAs you commemorate the play, you bequeath get the various nonions and actions of divers(prenominal) characters about it. However, having on the whole those different nonions and actions were fall in of Shakespe ar’s intention of revealing the chaff of honor. In Shakespeargon’s atomic number 1 IV, it shows that honor de pends greatly on the individual’s personal aspirations and morals. It was significantly emphasized as he juxtaposed the characters of Harry, King Henry IV’s son, and Hotspur, the Earl of Northumberland’s son, both(prenominal) of whom are potential successors to the King.\r\nHarry’s character is commendable with his wit by concealing his real nature and identity. On his first soliloquy he expresses that though he spends most of his period with lamentable companions ilk the robbers, etc. , he is taciturnly working on a policy-making agenda. He has true values were in a stylus reflected as he reimbursed what his friends stole. He is just doing that in order to lower the people’s expectations from him so that when the right time arrives, he would beat everyone as he unveils his true self.\r\nWith that, he will be able to gain King Henry’s softheartedness and the people’s admiration. According to Mabillard, Amanda, â€Å" Halâ₠¬â„¢s first soliloquy that this is merely an act, he is acutely aware of the bad federation he keeps, save prefers to show his true colors when necessary, wisely concluding that because expectations of him are so low, his accomplishments when shown will shine that often generation brighter. ” Harry in addition wished to be appraised cod to his own efforts and principles and not because of the crown on his sharpen. For him, a noble deed goes on with honor.\r\nHowever, his pattern of honor was dubious when he deemed that he can budge Hotspur’s honor by killing him. His concept of honor was also probed because of the way he treats and put down his friend Falstaff. Mabillard also added that, â€Å"Hal’s envy of Hotspur suggests he is not completely confident, since Hal needs to compare himself to others. When called to employment the rebellion, Hal comes of age, shedding his apathetic ways, even enlisting Falstaff his thieving friend to fight, symbolic of H al last accepting and assuming responsibility for himself and others. ”\r\nFor the reason of Hotspur, a military man with capricious actions, honor connotes winning in battles and argue one’s reputation against all odds. Fallstaff, the character Harlittz regards as, a person who â€Å"…is delineate as a liar, a braggart, a coward, a glutton, etc and yet we are not saturnineended exactly delighted with him; for he is all these as much to skylark others as to gratify himself,” regarded Honor as something useless and wasted that does no one any proficient. Falstaff also juxtaposes honor with violence. For Henry IV however, honor means the good of his people and kingdom.\r\nHe also believes that honor belonged to the rightful leader of the kingdom. This caused him the dilemma because of the way he was able to gain his actual crown, usurping Richard II’s throne and plotting his death. alike the essence of honor, the play also juxtaposes the nig htspot’s syllabus differences and the play’s coupling- south theme. As Stuart Hampton- Reeves stated, â€Å"The York scenes are detonateicularly significant, as they give a regional focus to the play in the sexual union, in much the equal way that, in 2 Henry VI, the Kentish rebellion of scallywag Cade gives a southern regional focus.\r\n in that location is, in fact, a subtle northern/south theme running through with(predicate) 3 Henry VI: the atomic number 16 line of the play pursues â€Å"the horseman of the north” and in that location are repeated references to north/south divisions. Here, the ESC got it wrong; the ESC portrayed the Yorkists as bluff northerners, and the Lancastrians as haughty southerners, but the play makes it clear several times that York’s power base is very in the south, in Kent and London, whilst Henry, with the Duchy of Lancaster and the index of Northumberland, holds the North. Henry is defeated at St.\r\nAlbans, in the south; York loses the next battle because he is isolated in the northern city of York. Battles crap blank around York, there are scenes in its castle, the Duke of York’s head is mounted on its walls,…” For the society’s class, the play also shows the upper class and the royalties as the trading floor revolves on the palace. And the similar time, it also shows the low class citizens such as the robbers, towns’ people, etc. at pig’s Tavern. It also juxtaposes the characters of Henry IV and Falstaff as they act as mentor and father to Harry.\r\nTwo men who are different in class, upbringing, virtue and principles are both playing the same position to Harry. Besides juxtaposition on the theme and characters, there were also several juxtapositions in terms of the scene. Just like in the ending of the play Richard II and the descent of Henry IV’s part 1. Wherein, on Richard II’s ending, Henry is already proclaimed as th e king and he is about to start his kinship. However, in the beginning of Henry IV, there is still the plan of Henry of having a crusade.\r\nAs Mabillard noted, â€Å"While it is true that these men all have personal reasons for rebelling, we cannot help but think that there is divine guidance at work, fulfilling Richard’s prophesy, causing Henry’s reign to be tumultuous. The body structure of the plays certainly supports this theory. Richard II died in 1400, and Shakespeare ends Richard II with Henry just beginning his reign. merely at the start of Henry IV, jump I, it seems that no time has passed since the death of Richard. The despatch to the Holy Land is still in Henry’s mind, and the action seems to take up right where it left off in Richard II. ”\r\nThe scene wherein Harry and Hotspur will have their combat is take place next to the similar encounter among Douglas and Falstaff. However, the encounter amongst Harry and Hotspur is embellished w ith intrepid talks and brave action and lifelike emotion while the encounter between Douglas and Fallstaff is embellished with talks about cowardice and profuse comic lines. Being a play that was written several years ago, and universe based on a story that happened on the years 1402-1403, some dexterity have the idea that using the same juxtaposition would cause the audience to looking at alienated due to the huge time span.\r\nHowever, the political issues narrated on the play are still very much relevant at the present period. Just the like the different views on honor, usurping of power, and war among political leaders. That is why I consider Shakespeare’s works as timeless.\r\nHampton-Reeves, Stuart. â€Å"Alarums and Defeats: Henry VI on Tour. ” http://www. chass. utoronto. ca/emls/05-2/hampalar. htm Mabillard, Amanda. â€Å"Analysis of Shakespeare’s Sources for 1 Henry IV. ” Shakespeare Online. 18 Aug. 2006. Hazlitt, William. Characters of S hakespeare’s Plays. London 1817.\r\n'